Word from the UK, Casino Royale is teh r0×0r
Daniel Craig is apparently best Bond since Connery ( provided you believe Connery to be the best Bond, I do, but Brosnan came close. ) Also supposed to be good for those of us who read the books ( I’m currently up to Dr.No, and I’m really enjoying them, so different, yet so much better than the films. ) Casino Royale sticks quite well to the book, but has been brought up to date.
I’m out to see it tonight, so proper reviews sometime soon. All crtitical contributions gratefully accepted.
UPDATE : So a group of us went to see Casino Royale this evening.
There were criticisms as to the plausability of the scene located around the construction site, by those working in construction. The obligatory Bond “bit” with the gunbarrel was considered over-rendered, though considering the poor quality of earlier versions, maybe they were over-compensating ;O)
The film contained large chunks of the book, some parts had been reworked to suit, liberal use of artistic license was employed, but it stuck very close to the essence of Bond, walking that very thin line between the Bond of the novels and the Bond film stereotype. I’m all for the Bond of the films to become more like the Bond of the books, and this, for me, is a step in the right direction.
I’m fairly keen to gloss-over the revisionist history of Judy Dench as M, there are probably other examples too, but as with the construction site critique, I can live with the idea that it’s just a movie.
It is, I must say, beautifuly shot, and they really have found some lovely places to shoot, that whole high-roller life style just oozes from the screen. The locations contrasted well, and they appear to have gotten great weather. You can tell I’m English, I went to see a movie and I comment on how the weather was within it :Op
Action, lots of action, more so than in the book, and is very well cut to really give recent action flicks a run-for-their-money. I am quite embarrassed to admit it, I did actually get a touch of vertigo at the begining of the film.
Product-placement was reasonably discreete I guess, there was heavy mobile phone usage, though it didn’t detract from the film at all, more a sign-of-the-times really, though I guess Bond films always have been, and I guess it all adds to the high-roller high-tech feel.
The Humour was very dry, it’s quite a dark film, but the Brits around me were giggling away, a lot more frequently than the locals, though I did feel they entered into the spirit of it after a while. Casino Royale is a fairly down-to-earth plot, it is without the grandios megalomanic scenarios found in some of the other films which are known as a sterotype of the Bond flick.
I did feel that everyone in the cinema really enjoyed the film, and I think Daniel Craig was universally accepted, that he had earned his double-O status with the audience … err … so to speak. I think fans of both the books and the films will not be disappointed, and indeed might be considered a fairly accesible film for those who wouldn’t normally see a Bond movie.